Over 2 million UK vehicles have outstanding manufacturer recalls

DVLA recall archive

UK vehicle safety recall archive

The archive holds 15,570 DVLA vehicle safety recalls dating back to 1992. Filter by manufacturer, year, or keyword. To check whether a specific vehicle is affected by an outstanding recall, run a live VRM recall check for £1.99.

Reset

Showing 151–167 of 167 recalls.

  • 26 Apr 2002MITSUBISHI SHOGUNRef R/2001/158

    POSSIBLE LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL

    Defect

    Under severe and extreme conditions where the vehicle is used mainly off-road in a wet muddy environment it is possible that the tapered section of the ball pin on the steering Pitman arm may break. This in the worst case could result in a loss of steering control.

    Remedy

    Recall the affected vehicles and replace the Pitman arm with a quality assured component.

    Vehicles affected
    50,846
    Build start
    01 Jan 1990
    Build end
    31 Dec 1999
  • 12 Mar 2002MITSUBISHI COLTRef R/2001/168

    ENGINE CRANKSHAFT PULLEY CONCERN

    Defect

    The crankshaft pulley may become loose causing a rattling noise from the engine battery warning light to come on and a high steering effort will be noticed.

    Remedy

    All recalled vehicles will have the crankshaft pulley bolt tightened to the correct specified torque.

    Vehicles affected
    1,687
    Build start
    01 Jan 1999
    Build end
    31 Dec 2000
  • 29 Jan 2002MITSUBISHI SHOGUNRef R/2001/129

    POSSIBLE LOSS OF POWER ASSISTANCE TO BRAKES

    Defect

    There is a possibility that the accumulator diaphragm in the Hydraulic Brake Booster (HBB) might be manufactured improperly. This may cause the nitrogen pressure in the accumulator to drop. The following two symptoms may result :- 1) The brake assist might be delayed in sudden hard braking. 2) Relatively large brake pedal loads might be required after long-term parking and first engine start since specific brake pressure takes time to accumulate.

    Remedy

    The Hydraulic Brake Booster nitrogen accumulator will be replaced with a modified one on all affected vehicles.

    Vehicles affected
    4,319
    Build start
    01 Jan 2000
    Build end
    30 Jul 2001
  • 31 Oct 2001MITSUBISHI SPACE RUNNERRef R/2001/071

    POSSIBLE CRACKING OF FUEL TANK AND CHECK VALVE.

    Defect

    There is a possibility that the fuel tank upper panel may suffer from fatigue failure due to repeated stress caused by the fuel tank breathing. In addition the Spacerunners will be checked for cracks on the check valve due to interference with the cross member.

    Remedy

    If any cracks are apparent the fuel tank will be replaced if no crack is visible a reinforcement plate will be fitted the check valve will be re-located.

    Vehicles affected
    2,850
    Build start
    01 Jan 1998
    Build end
    31 Dec 2001
  • 31 Oct 2001MITSUBISHI SPACE WAGONRef R/2001/071

    POSSIBLE CRACKING OF FUEL TANK AND CHECK VALVE.

    Defect

    There is a possibility that the fuel tank upper panel may suffer from fatigue failure due to repeated stress caused by the fuel tank breathing. In addition the Spacerunners will be checked for cracks on the check valve due to interference with the cross member.

    Remedy

    If any cracks are apparent the fuel tank will be replaced if no crack is visible a reinforcement plate will be fitted the check valve will be re-located.

    Vehicles affected
    2,850
    Build start
    01 Jan 1998
    Build end
    31 Dec 2001
  • 27 Jul 2001MITSUBISHI LANCERRef R/2000/127

    ACTIVE YAW CONTROL ECU CONCERN

    Defect

    The Active Yaw Control ECU may be incorrectly programmed which may cause the clutches in the torque transfer differential to remain disengaged when the engine starts. This could result in damage to the rear axle differential.

    Remedy

    Recall potentially affected vehicles and replace the Electronic Control Unit (ECU).

    Vehicles affected
    196
    Build start
    20 Dec 1996
    Build end
    17 Jul 1998
  • 12 Jul 2001MITSUBISHI GALANTRef R/2001/054

    SUSPENSION LOWER ARM BALL JOINT MAY SUFFER PREMATURE WEAR

    Defect

    There is a possibility that due to water and dirt ingress into the lower arm ball joint the ball stud and joint case may suffer from premature wear. In the worst case the ball stud may come out of the ball joint case.

    Remedy

    Recall affected vehicles inspect the lateral lower arm ball joints and replace if free play exceeds manufacturers specification.

    Vehicles affected
    5,189
    Build start
    01 Jan 1993
    Build end
    31 Dec 1996
  • 01 Jul 2001MITSUBISHI L200Ref R/2000/084

    POSSIBLE LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL

    Defect

    Under severe and extreme conditions where the vehicle is used mainly off-road in a wet muddy environment it is possible that the tapered section of the ball pin on the steering 'Pitman arm' may break. This in the worst case could result in a loss of steering control.

    Remedy

    Recall the affected vehicles and replacing the Pitman arm with a quality assured component.

    Vehicles affected
    6,218
    Build start
    01 Jan 1996
    Build end
    30 Sept 2000
  • 22 Jan 2001MITSUBISHI GALANTRef R/2000/090

    FUEL TANK MAY CRACK AND LEAK

    Defect

    There is a possibility that the fuel tank may be incorrectly welded on its upper panel and baffle plate in the tank causing it to crack on the welded position. In the worst case this may cause the fuel tank to leak fuel.

    Remedy

    Inspect the vehicles replace the fuel tanks if leaking and in cases where no abnormality is found apply a protector plate.

    Vehicles affected
    1,456
    Build start
    24 Aug 1995
  • 18 Dec 2000MITSUBISHI PININRef R/2000/101

    THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE ENGINE MAY STOP WHEN DRIVING

    Defect

    There is a possibility that a condenser may become detached from the circuit board due to the breakage of the component wiring. The engine may stop or be difficult to start.

    Remedy

    Recall affected vehicles and apply silicone to the condenser to act as a vibration damper to counteract shocks that can be transmitted from the suspension through the body to the circuit board.

    Vehicles affected
    1,464
    Build start
    01 Jan 1999
    Build end
    31 Dec 2000
  • 06 Nov 2000MITSUBISHI COLTRef R/2000/083

    POTENTIAL DETACHMENT OF CRANKSHAFT PULLEY

    Defect

    The Crankshaft Pulley securing bolt may not have been correctly torqued. The bolt may loosen or break and in the worst case result in detachment of the pulley.

    Remedy

    All engines up to engine number YD2145 - remove pulley securing bolt increase the depth of the thread in the Crankshaft by 5 mm. Check bolt for damage and renew if necessary. Lubricate threads refit and tighten to specified torque. Engines numbered from YD2146 onwards - remove pulley securing bolt examine for damage and renew if necessary lubricate threads refit and tighten to specified torque.

    Vehicles affected
    4,246
    Build start
    01 Jan 1996
    Build end
    31 Dec 1999
  • 27 Sept 2000MITSUBISHI SHOGUNRef R/2000/079

    FRONT FLEXIBLE BRAKE HOSE

    Defect

    Brake fluid may seep from the front flexible brake hoses impairing the efficiency of one or both braking circuits.

    Remedy

    Recall the affected vehicles for replacement of both front flexible brake hoses.

    Vehicles affected
    286
    Build start
    01 Jan 1994
    Build end
    31 Dec 1994
  • 24 Aug 2000MITSUBISHI GALANTRef R/2000/063

    BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE REDUCED

    Defect

    The nipple for the brake booster vacuum hose may become choked due to adhesion and accumulation of combustion products from the engine. This may cause in the worst case reduced braking efficiency after operating the brake pedal several times in a short period.

    Remedy

    Recall affected vehicles to relocate nipple from intake manifold to resonator to avoid accumulation of combustion products.

    Vehicles affected
    1,878
    Build start
    01 Jan 1998
    Build end
    31 Dec 1999
  • 24 Aug 2000MITSUBISHI SPACE WAGONRef R/2000/063

    BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE REDUCED

    Defect

    The nipple for the brake booster vacuum hose may become choked due to adhesion and accumulation of combustion products from the engine. This may cause in the worst case reduced braking efficiency after operating the brake pedal several times in a short period.

    Remedy

    Recall affected vehicles to relocate nipple from intake manifold to resonator to avoid accumulation of combustion products.

    Vehicles affected
    1,878
    Build start
    01 Jan 1998
    Build end
    31 Dec 1999
  • 21 Aug 2000MITSUBISHI TRUCK CANTERRef R/2000/085

    BRAKES MAY BIND

    Defect

    There is a possibility that due to insufficient lubrication the parking brake cable might not fully return when released. This may cause the brakes to bind.

    Remedy

    Recall affected vehicles and replace parking brake cables with modified type.

    Vehicles affected
    1,284
    Build start
    18 Sept 1997
    Build end
    16 Apr 1999
  • 01 Nov 1997MITSUBISHI COLTRef R/1997/074

    LOSS OF BRAKING SYSTEM VACUUM ASSISTANCE

    Defect

    The brake booster vacuum hose check valve may stick and cause a loss of vacuum to the brake booster. This will result in greatly increased brake pedal effort and increased stopping distances.

    Remedy

    The affected vehicles are being recalled to have the brake booster vacuum hose replaced with a quality assured unit.

    Vehicles affected
    218
    Build start
    17 Jun 1997
    Build end
    21 Aug 1997
  • 14 Nov 1994MITSUBISHI COLTRef R/1994/073

    FRONT BRAKE HOSES MAY HAVE BEEN INCORRECTLY INSTALLED DURING ASSEMBLY

    Defect

    It is possible that installation of the front brake hoses has not been correctly carried out during initial assembly.

    Remedy

    Recall the affected vehicles for the fitment of replacement brake hoses.

    Vehicles affected
    169
    Build start
    01 Jan 1992
    Build end
    31 Dec 1994

Want to check a specific vehicle?

The DVLA archive lists recalls by make and model. Run a live VRM check to see whether your vehicle has an outstanding recall right now.

Run a recall check for £1.99 →